Would a €99 rescue make your existing job spreadsheet easier to run?
This experiment tests whether small businesses would value a simple service that improves the Excel or Google Sheets tracker they already use for jobs, costs, invoices and outstanding payments — without moving to new software.
€99 is a proposed pilot price only. Expressing interest doesn’t create an order, contract or payment obligation.
The idea, in three steps
A tracker you can’t fully trust
Grown with the business, now patchy and hard to read.
We fix the control points
One workbook, one core workflow, up to three calculations.
- Standardise job IDs and statuses
- Repair broken or missing calculations
- Auto-total cost, profit and outstanding
- Add a management summary view
A dependable view at a glance
Same file, now clear on money and margin.
Built for validation — all names and figures are fictional, and this is not a customer testimonial.
If the spreadsheet basically works but has become hard to trust, is fixing it better than replacing it?
The hypothesis is that many trades and field-service businesses would rather improve the file they already understand than migrate to another platform. This page exists to find out whether that’s true — including finding out that it isn’t.
Keep the existing tool
Start from the Excel or Google Sheets file the business already knows.
Fix the key control points
Job status, costs, invoicing, outstanding amounts and the calculations that drive them.
Improve visibility
A clearer tracker and a management view — without a forced system migration.
A deliberately small, fixed scope — so the €99 question tests one clear outcome.
Narrow on purpose: this isn’t open-ended spreadsheet consultancy. The point is to learn whether a small, specific rescue is worth paying for.
This scope is being tested and may change before any commercial launch.
- One existing workbook
- One core job-control workflow
- Up to three repaired or improved calculations
- One management summary / dashboard
- One revision
- Target 48-hour turnaround after scope is confirmed
No payment is taken on this page.
What the pilot would and wouldn’t take on.
Keeping the edges clear is what makes the €99 test meaningful rather than a stand-in for a much bigger job.
Currently proposed
- One Excel or Google Sheets workbook
- One main job-control workflow
- Up to three calculations improved or repaired
- One summary / dashboard view
- One revision
Outside the experiment
- Full accounting, tax or payroll systems
- Multi-app implementations
- Large linked-workbook rebuilds
- Custom mobile software
- Replacing a full field-service platform
Four steps, each a little more committing than the last.
We want to tell casual interest apart from genuine intent before deciding whether to launch the service commercially. No payment is requested at any step.
Problem resonance
Tell us whether your current tracker has this kind of problem.
Yes, this sounds familiarSolution interest
Ask to see the before/after example and decide whether the outcome is useful.
Send me the exampleBehavioural intent
Describe your tracker and the one problem you’d want fixed. Don’t send the workbook yet.
Check whether mine fitsCommercial intent
Tell us whether you’d consider paying the proposed €99 if the scope fits.
I’d consider €99Have a tracker that basically works but is getting harder to trust?
Describe the problem first. No card details, payment or live workbook are needed during validation.